The NCPCOG distorts the teachings of Father Ahnsahnghong and denies Heavenly Mother(Identity of NCPCOG). In the hope that no one will be misled by this organization, let us reveal their identity.
NCPCOG’s false insistence
They insist wrongly as follows: Three chapters from the book “The Mystery of God and the Spring of the Water of Life” were taken out―“Restoration of Jerusalem and the prophecy of 40 years,” “Bring the truth into light through church history books,” and “I will send Elijah.” Do you know about this?
Of course, we know it.
Then, do you know whom did Father leave His truth books to? Father left them to Heavenly Mother.
In His sermon titled, “Walking With God,” Father wrote that “I follow Mother,” and He Himself said, “Everything will go well if you listen to Mother.” Through this, Father clarified that Father’s will and Mother’s will are the same.
So, the only thing we have to do is to follow Mother wherever She goes.
Heavenly Mother who is of the same spirit with Father Ahnsahnghong took out three chapters from “The Mystery of God and the Spring of the Water of Life,” for our salvation. It is the work done by God the Lord of the Word; this is not something that we, creatures and sinners, can dare to argue over. If we do, it is like a lump of clay argues with the potter who made it.
Countermeasures for NCPCOG’s false insistences
Click the posts to read countermeasures about their false insistences.
- False insistence 1: Through the book “The New Jerusalem and the Bride: Explanation on Women’s Veil” published in October 1983, Father Ahnsahnghong Himself clarified that there is no Heavenly Mother. So, Heavenly Mother does not exist and the bride refers to the saints.
- False insistence 3: The word “Elohim” was not used when Father was in this world. The general pastor of the Church of God made it.
- False insistence 4: Father Ahnsahnghong is Christ who came a second time. However, His name was not given to us as the Savior’s name, so we should pray in the name of Jesus even now. (The NCPCOG’s first church in Busan did not acknowledge Father as Christ who came a second time, but regarded Him as just a prophet. However, now they claim to acknowledge Father as Christ who came a second time, in their replies on the Internet.)