The NCPCOG distorts the teachings of Father Ahnsahnghong and denies Heavenly Mother(Identity of NCPCOG). In the hope that no one will be misled by this organization, let us reveal their identity.
NCPCOG’s false insistence
They falsely insist as follows: Father Ahnsahnghong is Christ who came a second time. However, His name was not given to us as the Savior’s name, so we should pray in the name of Jesus even now.
1. There exists the name of the Holy Spirit
If God’s work of salvation finishes with the name of Jesus, why does the name of the Holy Spirit exist?
If only the name of the Father and the name of Son are the names of Savior and the work of salvation finishes with the two names, Jesus should have told His disciples to give people baptism, the sign of salvation, with only two names?the name of the Father and the name of the Son; He should not have uttered the name of the Holy Spirit.
However, Jesus told them to go and give baptism to all people in three names―in the name of the Father, of the Son and of the “Holy Spirit” (Mt 28:18). So, their insistence is wrong.
The Bible clearly testifies that there is the age when we receive salvation in the name of the Father, and the age when we receive salvation in the name of the Son (Isa 43:11; Act 4:11). So, there must be the age of the Holy Spirit when we receive salvation in the name of the Holy Spirit?the last name among the three names Jesus spoke.
2. The name of the Holy Spirit in the Bible
If the people of God, who live in the last days, are saved in the name of Jesus, shouldn’t there be a prophecy that another name will be given to them. However, the Bible clearly prophesies that he who overcomes, that is, the people of God, will receive the new name of Jesus (Rev 3:12; 2:17).
Can the new name be Jesus? Jesus’ new name cannot be Jesus; it must be another name. Then, why does God give us Jesus’ new name? Does He give it to us with no reason? Think of the times when God gave the name of the Father and of the Son.
When God gave the name of the Father, it was the name of the Savior and people prayed in that name. When God gave the name of the Son, it was the name of the Savior and the saints prayed in that name.
Then, when God gives us Jesus’ new name, isn’t it natural that it is the Savior’s name and we must pray in that name?
They are foolish enough to insist that the name of the Holy Spirit is “Counselor.” The counselor is not a name but a title.
For example, there are titles like president and teacher. Can we say that those tiles are the name of a person?
Above all things, the name of the Father and of the Son were proper names―Jehovah and Jesus respectively. Then, how can we say that only the name of the Holy Spirit is not a proper name but only a title? Therefore, their insistence is wrong.
Countermeasures for NCPCOG’s false insistences
Click the posts to read countermeasures about their false insistences.
- False insistence 1: Through the book “The New Jerusalem and the Bride: Explanation on Women’s Veil” published in October 1983, Father Ahnsahnghong Himself clarified that there is no Heavenly Mother. So, Heavenly Mother does not exist and the bride refers to the saints.
- False insistence 2: Three chapters from the book “The Mystery of God and the Spring of the Water of Life” were taken out: “Restoration of Jerusalem and the prophecy of the 40 years,” “Bring the truth into light through church history books,” and “I will send Elijah.”